Document Controls

  • View a Print Friendly version of this document

    Print
  • Toggle highlighting of search terms in this document

  • Text Size: 

    • A (normal)
    • A (larger)
    • A (largest)

For Market Insights Professionals

Primary Analyst Photo Document Information Rate this Document

February 22, 2008

Does Declining Research Projectability Matter?

Yes, But Not As Much As You Think

by Brad Bortner

with Ellen Daley, Heidi Shey

Average:
(2 ratings)

This is an excerpt

Executive Summary

Conventional wisdom holds that online panels are inherently problematic in supplying projectable findings to the general population — online and offline. Critics assert that online panels aren't representative and that new types of dirt in the data — such as professional survey takers — erode the accuracy of projections. However, it's hard to find any substantive marketing decisions that have gone awry due to using online panel-based research. Why? Because good online panels actually deliver as much accuracy as they give up. Market research professionals should leverage what online panels are good at — speed, cost, and new analytic approaches — and at the same time hedge risk by mixing data collection modes, expanding their analysis framework to create "what if" models, and understanding that sometimes speed of result trumps accuracy and cost.

This is an excerpt

Buy Risk-Free

Price: US $499

Our Service Guarantee: If you are not completely satisfied with this document, notify Forrester within 24 hours of purchase for a full refund.

Already a Forrester Client?
Log in to read this document.

Add to cart

Save and Share

Document Tools

Spread the word: